3. DYNAMICS - PHYSICS OF SPACE AND TIME

The development of Global Mechanics has explained the gravity-energy-mass equivalence in the extent of unifying the force of gravity with electromagnetic energy, and the clarification of how mass is created from the reticular structure of matter, or globine, in order to distinguish it from normal matter.

Likewise, Global Mechanics gives the foundation for Dynamics - Physics of space and time, or concept of Dynamics, as a science that studies the causes of movement.

After Newton's Laws, two problems emerged regarding Dynamics - Physics of space and time, the effect of gravitational lens of light and the anomalous precession of the perihelion of Mercury. Both problems were resolved by Einstein's Relativistic Mechanics although, in my opinion, Relativistic Dynamics is incorrect as well as incompatible with both Quantum Mechanics and Global Mechanics.

 Furthermore, Relativistic Mechanics considerably adjusts the concept of Dynamics by playing down the very same space and time.

Quantum Mechanics, in turn, discovers new conflicting ideas in the Dynamics of Newton's Laws in the world of the atom and elementary particles.

The in-depth study of the concept of Dynamics by Global Physics not only resolves the problem of the curvature of light and the small deviation in the orbits of the planets but also distinguishes between the different types of movement a propos the causes or nature of the forces that bring them about.

The study of the causes of the motion of Dynamics in Global Physics has implied the appearance of a new perspective in the classification of different types of forces and energy.

Therefore, Newton's Laws of Dynamics need a small quantitative adaptation and a large conceptual change, especially in the area of its application.

Before explaining in depth the mechanisms and forces of movement of light and bodies in free fall, their motion upon globine or through it, we are going to analyze the elements of the concept of Dynamics of Global Physics such as space, time, movement and velocity, acceleration and force.

 

3.a) Concept of space 

Both time and space are conventional concepts or mental elaborations that we create in order to be able to live, understand this world and try to represent the Dynamics of that which exists, or reality. The concept of space is necessary for a definition of movement.

Currently, the meter definition for the Dynamics of Relativistic Physics depends on the speed of light, which, in turn, depends on relative time. It cannot be simpler!

In spite of the fact that the idea of space is simple, the human brain has problems when it comes to managing three spatial dimensions in many branches of knowledge. Therefore, we have to be especially careful with the scientific configuration of the definition of space and to not make it more complex than necessary.

As always, the brunt of the scientific work of Dynamic Physics of space and time consists of establishing some conventional patterns that can be applied in all situations, can allow for comparisons and are as simple as possible.

The result is a much more powerful understanding of reality that facilitates greater scientific and technological development of society.

The online book, Global Mechanics, explains what are called processes of expansion and contraction of space without abandoning the nature of Euclidean space or concept of three-dimensional space. Furthermore, Global Dynamics allows us to understand an important characteristic of the concept of relativistic space.

I hope the following example will help understanding of the different nature of space in Global Dynamics and in Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. It is not an exact example but it comes close and, at times, it can make it so the relativistic texts can be better understood.

• Example of crossing a river

  Imagine we have to cross a small river and there is no bridge. We will have to find a place where there are stones so we can cross by jumping stone to stone to the other side without getting wet.

  Concept of relativistic space 

  The Relativistic Dynamics states that the river is seven meters wide at the site where we can cross if we jump onto seven stones. That is, if a month later someone put another stone to make it easier to jump across, the Relativistic Mechanics then states that the width of the river is eight meters. At this rate, if a stone disappears because of being carried away by the water or a by stone thief, then it would be six meters.

  This confusion is due to the fact that Einstein’s Theory of Relativity does not allow for stones to be in the riverbed. Or it ignores that the reticular structure of gravity (globine) is the support medium for light and mass, with the total drag of light and the partial drag of mass, regardless of the gravitational effects of the Merlin effect, as we will see when discussing the movement of free falling bodies.

We need to make a distinction between the effects of globine as a support medium that explain the Michelson-Morley experiment, the small displacements of mass, and the second component of atractis causa, or the Merlin effect in the gravitational interaction that explain the phenomena of the curvature of light in the gravitational lens and the anomalous precession of the orbit of Mercury and of the planets in general, as presented in the book, Law of Global Gravity.

In Dynamic - Physics, there are other divergences between relativistic space and Euclidean space due to the mathematical effects of the relativity of time and its different causes, but this is not the time to go into it in detail. In any case, by confirming globine as a support medium for light, Einstein’s Theory of Relativity immediately vanishes.

 

3.b) Nature of time  

The basic elements of the Dynamics of Global Physics are space, time, and Globus since everything else is derived from them.

Time has various meanings as I have commented in the section about the Theory of time in the online book, Equation of Love. As far as Dynamic - Physics and the concept of movement and the scientific method, the relevant concept should be absolute and objective time; because, besides the inaccuracy of Einstein’s Theory of Relativity, it fulfills the scientific objectivity and is much simpler.

 Although reality can be perceived in many forms and, mathematically, some of them offer very precise calculations, it does not seem that the Imperial System of Measurements is as simple as the International System of Units (SI), ignoring the relativistic units from the latter.

There are things that, due to their significance, should be proven, or be able to be directly proven if they want to belong to a field of science and not just to philosophy. I think that no one or anything has travelled in time, except travel in absolute time which we are all familiar with. Likewise, no one has seen space bending and later straightening; or movement through other physical dimensions that only exist in abstract terms (Contradictus in terminus)

Likewise, in the online book, Theory of Relativity, Elements and Kritics, I have dedicated a section to the concept of space-time in the Kinematics of Relativistic Physics.

So that the concept of Dynamics is truly functional and efficient, a new definition of the unit of absolute or objective time is necessary for it to be independent from energy. Currently, by depending on energy, the second is certainly relative given that it depends on the vibrations of the Cesium atom, the period of which is based on certain energy levels that depend, in turn, on many factors, among which are velocity and gravity.

The only thing there is to do is to change the definition of time, or better said, the second definition established in 1967 by the International System of Units so that it is no longer influenced by the environmental changes that produce modifications in the frequency of the photons of the Cesium atom.

Besides facilitating normal mental processes, this definition of time allows us to be able to accurately discuss a Dynamic Physics of normal space and time by specifying both the concept of simultaneity of the events and that of the cause-effect sequence; being that both concepts are enormously useful in both the new Theory of Gravitation of Global Physics, as well as day to day life. No doubt, the opposite is mad science.

It is worth remembering that the definition of relativistic time denies the concept of simultaneity and that certain branches of Quantum Mechanics openly defend the inexistence of the cause-effect sequence, which is certainly indispensable, even in philosophy.

 The physical experiment of the Invisible Clock proposed by the Theory of Global Equivalence in the book, Physics Experiments, directly deals with the controversial measurement of time and the god Chronos. The idea of this name is to highlight the fact that clocks are affected by velocity and gravity. A perfect clock would be an invisible one in the sense of being independent from any condition; that is, it may not be enough to be invisible, but the idea it conveys is still valid.

Regarding the problem of simultaneity, the scientific experiment of the Abrujuela’s Train is proposed, keeping in mind the speed of light and the rotational movement of the Earth.

In short, I believe the concept of absolute time for scientific purposes to be a monotonous, uniform, constant and growing function.