IV.b.3. Celestial Mechanics and Planet Mercury’s orbit
If prediction of Einstein’s General Relativity about curvature of light is the most striking and spectacular one, due to its verification with the eclipse of 1919, explanation of precession of perihelion of Mercury’s orbit –deviation from Newton’s Celestial Mechanics– is the most effective one thanks to its quantitative nature.
However, let us remark that in 1898 Paul Gerber explained this precession before relativistic physics with the same exact formula.
Astronomers had observed a deviation –unexplained by any known factor– of 43.1” of arc (43 arc seconds) in 100 years in the axis of planet Mercury’s orbit. This deviation is to what normally refers precession of perihelion of Mercury’s orbit, although in a strict sense, total precession –sum of explained and notexplained precessions– is quite a lot bigger. Nonexplained precession of Mercury’s orbit is about one tenthousandth of a degree per year.
By means of complex field equations of relativistic mechanics, Einstein arrived to a figure very close to 43” arcseconds of precession of Mercury’s orbit, not explained by Celestial Mechanics. See the webpage of Mathpages regarding the anomalous precession of Mercury’s orbit as explained by General Relativity.
It is not surprising that, in view of adjustment to orbits of the planets obtained by General Relativity, relativity as a whole would end up accepted, in detriment of other less adventurous alternatives. It is unquestionable that field equations of Einstein’s General Relativity contain some valid behavioral rules of nature, though they may hide in their mechanisms of conduct and calculus. Of course, we could say the same about Paul Gerber original ideas.
Let us now look to see if the Laws of Global Gravity also explain the precession of the perihelion of Mercury’s orbit.
Expression for gravity acceleration –taken from formula of the Global Law of Gravity– provides us with desired results on angular deviation and normal component of acceleration or centripetal acceleration.
To know total angular deviation in one revolution or orbit of Mercury, we only have to substitute variables for their values; keeping in mind acceleration *g_{g}* should represent both gravity force due to centripetal acceleration corresponding to Newton’s law, and to Merlin effect –second component of the atractis cause in Global Gravity Law.
That is, *g_{g}* will be the normal component of the acceleration or centripetal acceleration, which will cause a complete revolution of the planet in its orbit and observed precession for the period *T*.
This period *T*, by its definition in trigonometry, would cause exactly one complete revolution if Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitation were exclusively considered, given that we know that a perfectly elliptical orbit would result from the inversesquare law –of the radius. As Kepler’s laws showed from orbits of the planets of Celestial Mechanics.
Don Magufo revealed a fast way to estimate centripetal acceleration or normal component of the acceleration with intuitive mathematics. But before continuing, we would like to review the necessary data to carry out calculus, plus the unnecessary *v*, which are:
For empirical verification of planet Mercury’s dynamics, the following steps have been taken:
Circular planetary orbit
We have chosen a circular orbit case in order to simplify calculus, because the play of gravity forces would continue to exist and eccentricity of planet Mercury’s orbit is quite low. It is enough for our purpose here.

Calculus of revolutions per period with Newton’s Law of Gravity
The formula for the Global Gravity Law can be written as a sum of two components:
The first term on the right hand side of equation is gravity of Newton’s law, or centripetal acceleration. In one period, it produces an angular variation of one revolution –or 2π radians.
So then, if we multiply and divide it by *v²*, and substitute *v²/r* for the normal component of acceleration or centripetal acceleration *an*, we will be left with:
Recalling that orbital speed is square root of *GM/r*, we have:
The normal component of acceleration *an* is related to change in direction of velocity with time. If we evaluate this change for each *m/s* (dividing it by *v*) and we multiply it by period *T* (number of total seconds in one revolution), it will give us through trigonometry *2π* radians –one entire revolution of planet’s orbit.
Analytically, above reasoning would be:
We could verify it by carrying out calculus using the value of average speed of the planet Mercury. (One entire revolution has 2π radians or 360 degrees, each degree has 60’ minutes and each minute has 60” arcseconds)
Centripetal acceleration
and linear speed of planet MercuryG 6,67266E11 Mass of the Sun 1,98892E+30 GM 1,32714E+20 Average radius 5,79000E+10 a_{n}= GM/r² 3,95876E02 Average v 4,794831E+04 a_{n} / v = w 8,25631E07 Revol. 100 years 4,149378E+02 Period T 7,60018E+06 w * T = 2 π 6,27494E+00 
Calculus of revolutions per period due to the Merlin effect
We are really looking for second term on the right hand side of equation for the Global Gravity Law, given that it is the centripetal acceleration caused by Merlin effect –double attraction provoked by kinetic energy. This centripetal acceleration will cause the precession of perihelion of Mercury (ppm) –or of any planet’s orbit in Celestial Mechanics– if we estimate it for the entire period, considering how we did it previously with *a(n)* in order to calculate the *2π* radians.
According to Don Magufo, the intuitive integral of the differential equation not set out can be directly resolved if, once *v²/r* is substituted by *a(n)*, we use its value for a whole period, which, as we have just discussed above, in terms of trigonometry will be *2π*.
In strict terms, it is enough to mention that formal integral, in relation to the period, of centripetal acceleration resolves without any problem; since speed, centripetal acceleration and rest of variables are all either constant or independent of time, due to simplification to a circular orbit of the planet Mercury. For this reason, it coincides with the basic calculations of trigonometry, as integral of *dt* is 1.
So it remains that:
Therefore, the precession of perihelion of Mercury in radians will be:
Value of ppm obtained using above equality, derived from Global Physics, is 43.08” arc seconds every 100 years, as following table shows:
G  6,67266E11  
Mass of the Sun  1,98892E+30  GM  1,32714E+20 
Average radius  5,79000E+10  a_{n}= GM/r  2,29212E+09 
c²  8,98755E+16  GM / r c²  2,55033E08 
π  3,141592654  π GM / r c²  8,01210E08 
2 π Radians/revol.  6,283185307  ppm = 2π² GM / r c²  5,03415E07 
Revol./100 years  4,14938E+02  radians/100 years  2,08886E04 
Arc sec/radian  2,06265E+05  Arc sec/100 years  4,30858E+01 
* * *
Let us recall that, if in this formula we replaced *2π* by *6*, it would give us the formula obtained by Paul Gerber in 1898 and Einstein in General Relativity, regardless of the eccentricity, as mentioned in the book Theory of Relativity, Elements and Criticism.
For Earth, Einstein’s General Relativity gives a value of 3.8 arcseconds; Global Physics gives 4.02, and the observed value is 5 arcseconds according to Mathpages mentioned website.
Average radius 10^{6} km 
Planets  Radians  Revolutions 100 years 
Total radians  Precession arc second  

Observed  RG  GF  
57,90  Mercury  5,03415E07  414,93780  2,08886E04  43.10  42,9195  43,08581 
108,20  Venus  2,69387E07  162,60160  4,38028E05  8.65  8,6186  9,03498 
149,60  Earth  1,94838E07  100,00000  1,94838E05  3,85  3,8345  4,01882 
227,90  Mars  1,27897E07  53,19150  6,80303E06  1,36  1,3502  1,40323 
778,30  Jupiter  3,74505E08  8,43170  3,15771E07  0,0623  0,06513  
1427,00  Saturn  2,04259E08  3,39440  6,93336E08  0,0137  0,01430  
2869,60  Uranus  1,01574E08  1,19030  1,20904E08  0,0024  0,00249  
4496,60  Neptune  6,48217E09  0,60680  3,93338E09  0,0008  0,00081  
5900,00  Pluto  4,94029E09  0,40320  1,99193E09  0,0004  0,00041 
Although there is no doubt both theories are good approximations –three if we include Paul Gerber–, or forms of looking at same problem in relation to orbit of the planet Mercury, we must say clearly they are mutually incompatible, since same angular deviation would be doubly explained.
Moreover, they have different and contradictory principles, which will make it unnecessary to resort to Occam razor, because there are other natural phenomena or physics experiments that will help to tip the balance definitively.
With the Laws of Global Gravity, we have verified that precession of the perihelion of Mercury's orbit is accurately explained, obtained as a result of the Merlin effect in the interaction of global or kinetic aether with bodies with mass.
In other words, principle of equivalence between gravitational and inertial mass established by Newton and upheld by Einstein is vague and unnecessary, given that behavior of physical mass in its interaction with kinetic aether is the same with or without gravitational field, although there could appear different forces. However, in Global Physics, there is no need to stretch time and space in order to explain elliptical orbits of the planets.
Section Second Law of Newton of the book Physics and Global Dynamics studies in more depth differences between Newton, Einstein and Global Physics, which are due to intrinsic changes in mass and acting forces.
To conclude, we would like to point out that not once has been abandoned the noncurved geometry of Euclidean space, despite planet Mercury’s orbit, and that Global Physics is consistent with absolute time.