Except for error or omission, and with the appropriate caution, the main results of the EDI study –Evolution and Design of Intelligence as a base of an alternative theory of evolution are presented in the following points:
The hereditary nature of relational intelligence is confirmed.
The historical difficulty to perceive this characteristic of the brain functions is due mainly to the next factors:
The multiple functions of the human intellect.
The lack of a suitable theoretical-philosophical base.
The fact that not all genetic load is expressed.
Lack of stability in the manifestation of intellectual power.
In certain cases, different IQ measurements from the same person could have the same deviations as those of monozygotic twins (identical) or those of dizygotic twins (twin brothers), which would be conceptually similar to semi-mono-environmental siblings as well.
Shortage of source data.
Randomness of the Mendelian genetic combination.
The existence of functional limitations or genetic problems in the expression of the genetic power of the human brain.
The necessity of a great capacity for statistical calculation and of intuitive understanding of the results of the Globus model.
It looks as if the method of Verification of the Genetic Information (VGI) is operative in the expression of the intelligence power in accordance with alternative theory of evolution GTCEL previsions.
In regards to the present case, this method shows that the significant genetic information in relation to intelligence will be found in both progenitors. The configuration of the concept of intelligence as a basic group of abstract relational abilities that are highly reliable in regards to their efficiency is a direct consequence of the previous.
The concepts of dominant gene and recessive gene of the Mendel laws are considerably affected by the implications of the existence of this method.
Approximately 500 million correlation coefficients have been calculated. From them, by means of the sensitivity analysis of the parameters implied in the evolution, it seems that male genes are those providing both direct and indirect internal evolution also indicated by the aforementioned alternative theory of evolution GTCEL.
The percentage of internal evolution of the intelligence potential that optimises the model is 5% for both internal evolutions; representing a total of 10%, again as foreseen by the alternative theory of evolution GTCEL.
These percentages explain why the IQ test must be normalized each 15 or 20 years.
The previous points rigorously support the logic of the existence of sexual differentiation and its great advantages; however, we should not forget that they mainly imply differences of a biological nature.
Another logical point is that the increase generated by men also comes from certain changes due to the improvement of available materials thanks to the amelioration in the quality of males' formation when in the womb.
On the other hand, it is very possible that women's genes fulfill a backup function to maximize the assurance of the viability of the new being.
If the previous conclusions were correct, the existence of a non-random and finalist evolution would be established at the same time. Therefore, the theory of natural selection would be realigned to a second temporal level as support to the evolutionary processes.
More extensive studies are strongly recommended, considering the extraordinary obtained results, (r² superior to 0.9) in order to be more accurate in the conclusions regarding qualitative specifications of the model and quantification of the parameters involved. These studies could also be referred to other types of conditional intelligence.
An example of further exploration of this study is found in the section that has been added subsequently, the Globus Model with mate selection and intelligence.
The creation of artificial intelligence quotients vectors has been achieved in a computer simulation model of the alternative theory of evolution. This can allow the study of the model and its variability by stages; for example, fixing the Mendelian combination, the level of genetic affinity and, finally, the functional limitations or genetic problems, etc.
It is important to stress that, not only is there a shortage of source data, but also that it can be very expensive to obtain the necessary and appropriate data.
Up to now, I hope that I have scrupulously respected the scientific method rules.
From previous conclusions and their philosophical implications, it appears that the current Gods of science, Ra & Dona, straight reminiscences of the Egyptian Goddess Hator and the Mesopotamic God Ale, have not been able to continue hiding the logic or intelligence of the evolution of life, nor to prevent the latter from formally appearing to us, although somehow, still timidly.