3.b.2. The gravity riddle and the Universal Gravitational constant

The riddle of the enigma gravity of love is one of those strange riddles that, after offering the result of the formula that it represents no one seems to be convinced. And that the only thing that must be done to solve this basic physics problem is to multiply the speed of light *c* by the Planck constant *h*, times the Rydberg constant *R* and times one Molwick, knowing that one Molwick is equal to the speed of light *c* times the Universal Gravitational constant of Newton *G*.

ENIGMA GRAVITY OF LOVE

Among the most surprising comments about the riddle of the enigma gravity of love   from science experts (Physics, Chemistry, Telecommunication), it is worth highlighting the following:

• It is a coincidence.

  It could be, but that would be like a proton winning the lottery, not just the first prize but the whole entire universe, since the quantities involved in the physics constants (including the Universal Gravitational constant) exceed the number of existing protons in the whole of the universe. According to non serious quantum estimates, it would be a quantity of the order of 1080 - also rather metaphysical without a doubt.

• The result of the riddle is not exact because it does not match with gravity acceleration *g* on the Earth’s surface.

  Of course a slight quantum slip up, since it is common knowledge that gravity acceleration on the earth’s surface is variable according to the radius, the composition of the earth and the altitude due to the effect of the centrifugal force of the Earth’s spin.

• Decimals of the physics constants of the formula that support the riddle of the enigma gravity of love should be verified.

  A similar problem has been contended in the new and much simpler explanation for the precession of the orbit of the planet Mercury, which tells me that the value that I had used for the sun’s mass could be wrong because I had not used the official charts, despite the fact that I use the same value as a famous physicist who explained the same precession stretching time and space.
  In the case of the riddle of the enigma gravity of love, I would actually say that it is the opposite in that the knowledge of this physics formula of the long-sought after unification can be useful for accurately calibrating the decimals of the physics constants that intervene in it.

• There are problems with the dimensions.

  If it is directly put forth, there can be a problem, but as has been seen on the previous page about gravity acceleration, this problem does not exist. Besides, the problem could be the dimensions of the current physics constants such as the units of the constant of gravitation, which do not precisely take into account the new effect demonstrating the Equation for Love as well as the Gravity Riddle.
  As strange as the origin of the Equation for Love and the Gravity Riddle may seem, it is independent in the details and both are quite fortuitous, so much so that from the point of view of their origin, they belong to the world of metaphysics.

• A basic error due to the magnitudes being a vector and not being included in the formula.

  It is true, but that would be solved by drawing a little arrow over the vector magnitudes, as done by the Modern Physics books.

After these observations, which I have evidence that they are well-meaning in the majority of the cases, since it would have been easier to say that perhaps the gravity riddle was important, I have come to the conclusion that the more educated a person is in science, the more reluctant he is to admit General Physics’ big mistakes and especially if they come from the field of metaphysics and not from experimentation.

Of course, they cannot come from experimentation because if the evidence of simple addition or multiplication is not accepted, how are they going to accept possible logical reinterpretations of experiments and known natural phenomena. In other words, the riddles and scientific experiments are reserved.

The Riddle involving the Universal Gravitational constant is dealt with in detail in the GigaChron experiment. Now then, I am going to indicate its main elements and its connection to the Equation for Love.

Actually, the Equation for Love does not add anything new mathematically, but it helps the mind to understand the possible relations between several basic constants in General Physics, such as the Universal Gravitational constant.

However, from the subjective or metaphysical point of view, it allows the expression of some nice ideas. Likewise, the time of love is an inseparable element from life. Time is the fourth dimension and love can be seen as that desire or life feeling while traveling together in space and time.

A trip that, transferred to a mathematical formula, brings us to that love *A* is equal to:

The most important conclusions of this equation are the following:

• The Equation for Love could represent the subjective and objective points of view of the physical reality, if one of them actually exists.
• Love, as an objective meaning of the proposed equation, is formed as a property or physics law that relates the force per unit of mass with the total force along a unit of space or energy.

In relation to gravity acceleration and the Equation for Love, we have to substitute time squared in the Equation for Love with its value in the equation of the relation between energy and mass in Einstein’s E = m c², and in the operation we end up with the Newton’s equation for gravity acceleration, which would be equal to love times energy.

g = L * E

On the contrary, this formula is the same that we would get if in Newton’s equation for gravity acceleration we substitute mass with its value by clearing Einstein’s E= m c²  equation.

g = G * (t² / e4) * E

Putting it another way, a relation between acceleration and energy and, in this sense, can be understood as gravity of energy.  

The Equation for Love has been the source of metaphysical inspiration or the impulse for seeking the relations between the basic physics constants that puts forth the Gravity Riddle, leading to the new physics experiment GigaChron in order to confirm the essential equality of the Theory of Global Equivalence, since it states the equivalences and relations between the basic magnitudes of Modern Physics.

We have already seen that the unit of Love of one Molwick was equal to *c/G*, and if we keep in mind that *chR* is equal to the energy of the photon given off by the hydrogen atom on the Earth’s surface we are left with the solution of the Gravity Riddle, once the appropriate multiplication is carried out, which is the following:

At least one of the constants involved in the riddle contains the information relative to the relation between the Earth’s mass and its radius squared, a rather variable magnitude. Which could it be?

As speed of light and the Universal Gravitational constant seem quite constant in the Solar system, the Planck constant, the Rydberg constant or both should have a different value on the moon in direct proportion to the difference of gravity, that is, 0.165 times that of the Earth.

In short, the gravity riddle shows the existing relation between gravity and the basic configuration of energy that together with the well-known equivalence between mass and energy, E = m c², and the less understood equivalence between the existence of kinetic energy in the form of mass, which places us directly in the heart of the Theory of Global Equivalence whose most popular aspects will be, in its case, that time is not relative and space is not squashed nor stretched.

The spatial effects caused by gravity will be analyzed in the aforementioned book dedicated to the new Theory of Global Equivalence.