3.b) Acceleration due to gravity
The concept of gravity has two aspects, the first being gravity acceleration *g* which a body exerts onto another that is found within its gravitational field. Initially, this gravity acceleration is independent from the mass of the second body. In addition, it will vary with the distance squared.
acceleration = space / time ² = m / s ²
In other words, which in my opinion it seems much more intuitive, gravity as a force of attraction per unit of mass or kilogram which will be exerted onto another object.
Force / mass = acceleration
N / kg = m / s²
The second refers to gravity as a force of attraction between two bodies, typically applied to the existing gravity force between planets or other stellar bodies with angular acceleration. In this case, gravity is the total force given that the previous concept of force per unit of mass multiplies by the mass of the body and we have:
Force = mass * force / mass
force / mass = acceleration
N = kg N kg = kg m / s ²
Logically, the gravity force that attracts them to each other is the result of the existence of the two masses, but we must not forget that there are two forces, one exerted on a mass and aimed toward the other and a second force exerted on the second mass or object and aimed toward the first.
The acceleration of gravity or force per the unit of mass will be:
g = G mass / space ²
Where G = 6.67 * 10-11 (m³/kg s²) or (N m² / kg²), by not depending on its spatial situation nor on the environment in which the masses find themselves, it is said that G is the Universal Gravitational Constant. It is also worth pointing out that in the different values of the gravity acceleration on the Earth’s surface, we include the effect of the centrifugal force due to the Earth’s rotation, even though we have not stated it for reasons of simplicity.
Gravity as a total force of attraction over another mass will be the intensity of the gravitational field in one point by the mass:
F = g mass2 = G mass 1 mass2 / space²
Newton’s apple has always interested me because it does not make sense as an explanation for the inspiration for the law of gravity, even though it seems clever. I think more of the biblical connotation of the word and that the ideas formed by thinking of those natural forces of attraction such as love, which is why he mentioned the apple.
It is interesting to note that Newton worked in the London Mint and he also occupied himself with theology and biblical questions, leaving some works about this subject matter, his Isaaci Newtoni Opera quae exstant omnia (1779) published by the doctor Horsley. Perhaps that is where the name Celestial mechanics comes from?
However, as we have seen, love is more a relationship than a force.
Let us look at another way or formula of defining and quantifying gravity acceleration, energy, and love.
In the Equation of Love, if we substitute time squared with its value in Albert Einstein’s equation –originally from Olinto de Pretto– for the relation between energy and mass E=mc², we get an equivalence where love is equal to gravity divided by energy.
Consequently, energy is equal to gravity divided by love (gravity of love)
Note that by breaking down *c* into *s/t* and clearing t ² from Albert Einstein’s equation, time does not have to be equal to one, given that it is eliminated in the substitution together with its corresponding space.
Let us look at some specific values for the acceleration due to gravity, energy and love in these formulas that are so metaphysical and so magical (Sir Magicwick thinks the most interesting is the last of the following):
The value that the Love Equation (L = Gt²/ e4) takes on, when the acceleration of time is 1 s/c², will be the same as for the relation between the acceleration of gravity exerted by a central mass of 1 kg to a distance equal to *c* and its energy equivalent to c² Julios. In addition, it will be equal to the unit called amorcito which was:
L = 1 amorcito = G/c²c² = 8.26069 * 10-45 (1/kg m) = G mass /s² E
This unit can always be understood as the acceleration of gravity that is induced by the energy of one Julio with a relation equal to 1 amorcito (g= L * E). Actually, once again we see that Love represents gravity of energy or that energy is the gravity of love.
Another important quantity would be love as a relation between gravity acceleration and energy that would result in a mass of 1 kg of mass to a distance of 1 meter, and assuming that 1 Julio was its equivalent energy, which would be equal to:
L = G mass / s ² E = G [(N/kg) / (N m)]
In other words, L would be equal to G if the speed of light *c* were *1 m/s*. Actually, we are doing mental exercises so that the neurons intuitively understand that the physics constants express the relations of unitary equivalence between the different physics magnitudes.
Now then, since we are in metaphysics and can play a little with physics. I am going to think that the Equation of Love does not represent the acceleration of time (because, as we have seen previously, it is not equal to the inverse of the typical acceleration of space) but represents the speed of time in a certain point of space squared; that is, in a point with a specific gravitational intensity.
In other words, the Love Equation is still the same but it becomes a different interpretation that allows us to separate the distance c ² from the distance *r* in the calculation for gravity acceleration. Moreover, for the earth’s surface it will be:
L = G/c4 * c²/r² * m/m 1,82502E-41 8,26069E-45 2,20929E+03 1
Furthermore, Love or the gravity/energy relation would vary with the square of the relation between the distance *c* and the distance *r* since we see the mass of Newton’s formula is compensated by the mass of energy, for example the mass *m* of the photon emitted by the hydrogen atom on the Earth’s surface.
A degree of greater freedom in the Equation of Love would be what happens with other relations between gravity and energy even if they were not equal. Since nothing impedes its analysis, so that by calculating the formula of the gravity force on the Earth’s surface with its mass *M* in relation to the energy indicated from the photon from the hydrogen atom, we have:
L = G/c4 * c²/r² * M/m = 1 Mw = c / G [(N/kg) / (N m) ]
An intriguing oddity since it is a rounded number; on the other hand, the value of the formula A adjusted to the earth’s surface coincides with the value of the unit that we had defined as Molwick duly advised by Sir Magicwick.
c/G = L = G/c4 * c²/r² * M/m 4,49493E+18 8,26069E-45 2,20929E+03 2,46294E+59
Lastly, by correspondingly rearranging the previous equality, we are left with unquestionable physics equality and something surprising:
g = E * L 9,79838E+00 2,17987E-18 4,49493E+18
Clearing g in the resulting equality we have that it is equal to energy multiplied by love. We came to the same qualitative result by analyzing the meaning of love in terms of physics by only interpreting its units.
From the previous equality having a general nature, the gravity acceleration in any point can be calculated if we know the energy of the photon from the hydrogen atom emitted in this point and the constants *c/G*, assuming that *c* and *G* were really constants - a matter that is becoming more dark every day.
In short, this relation of equivalence between energy and gravity is one of the scientific foundations of the new Global Physics and its Global Mechanics, which directly relate to the Gravity riddle and the Gigachron experiment; furthermore, their duty is to substitute the General Relativity and the Quantum Mechanics.
The formula for the acceleration of gravity based on energy refers to the relation that exists with gravity at the moment and place of the transformation, generation, or creation of energy of a photon, and not to the quantity of photons emitted.
However, back to metaphysics, we could say that gravity is the energy of love!